I was very pleased to note that Music Mark have entered the fray regarding the potential removal of ESG funding for Local Authority Music Services. Their statement makes it very clear that such directive from central Government over the way in which ‘local’ authorities makes decisions is ’ill-judged, very damaging to music education provided by some music services and even potentially conflicts with the government’s own Department for Communities and Local Government policy on “giving local authorities more control over how they spend public money in their area?”. I hear that further work is being done by Music Mark on this issue. I’m happy to apologise for being a bit hasty in my criticism of them in previous tweets. We need to support all our national music education organisations.
Curiously, directives from central Government have always held sway over the principles of localism. You only have to look at the ways in which local council’s decisions about planning and housing are routinely overturned by the Secretary of State to see that the principles of localism are tokenistic at best.
If you are a primary school teacher, please consider helping my friend and colleague Jackie Schneider by filling in this short questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/BWZJ5MR
The reducing allocation of Local Authority funding to support music education has been a long term theme in my blog. However, there was one further aspect of the potential cuts to music education that I didn’t write about in the previous post. This relates to the relocation of music education to the DCMS and most notably, of course, Arts Council England. Continue reading
The Department for Education have released a new consultation regarding the Education Services Grant (ESG). Whilst this might not immediately sound like it has anything to do with music education, it most certainly does! The ESG is a grant paid to Local Authorities and academies for the provision of various education services. It is calculated on a per-pupil basis. The services it covers includes music education. In 2012/13, this figure was £14,344,043, the year before it was £17,337,019 and it had been as high as £25m under the previous Government.
The current Government’s proposal is to remove this funding completely from the ESG. You have to go into the fine print of the consultation to find the relevant paragraphs, but here they are from section 4.5 headed Central Support Services: Continue reading
I’ve been watching the development of Fract over the last year or so. We’re delighted to see that it launches on the 22nd April 2014. For those of you that haven’t heard of Fract, it’s a first person based exploration game based on sound and synthesis. It is designed to be a journey of musical discovery within which you make music through different games based on the components of synthesisers. The Fract website has loads of teasers relating to different components of the game.
I’ve just pre-ordered our copy and you can do the same here. It looks and sounds fantastic and we can’t wait to start playing.
There are some very powerful sentiments in this:
The Schools Music Association (SMA), an organisation with a 76 year history of working in music education, has voted to become part of the Incorporated Society of Musicians, the professional body for musicians and subject association for music. This is good news for the SMA who will benefit from the expertise of the ISM’s full-time staff-team and it further strengthens the ISM’s sphere of influence in terms of guaranteeing a strong voice for the music education profession at the national level.
You can find further information about this merger in this press release. Personally, I think that this is a wise move on the part of the SMA and represents a helpful consolidation of what is still a significantly fractured community of diverse interests and competing ideologies. I would like to congratulate the staff at both the SMA and the ISM for having the foresight and wisdom to put whatever differences they may have had aside and work together for a common cause. It is no secret that I hold the ISM in the highest regard in respect of their campaigning and support for music education over a very difficult few years.
I’m delighted to publish this paper written by Piers Spencer in response to the now infamous Ofsted report published last year. You can read my thoughts on that report here.
The recent paper (November 2013) from Ofsted concerning music in English schools is the latest in a sequence of documents commissioned by the current government since 2010. The first was a report from Darren Henley, chief executive of Classic FM. Entitled Music Education in England, it recommended the establishment of local ‘Hubs’ to promote and support music in schools, the teaching of instruments and the development of singing. The government followed it with a National Plan for Music Education and there were two further reports from Ofsted before the present one appeared, bearing the title What Hubs must do. With a somewhat sensational heading on the Ofsted website that read ‘Music Hubs fail’, it marked a worrying change of tone from previous reports. In this response, I am going to concentrate on the critical remarks it makes concerning the role of music in the classroom, backed, it says by evidence from a sample of 31 schools.
While heads, governors, parents, the press and politicians see public performances as making a positive contribution to school culture, there is very little interest in day-to-day classroom music. Many primary schools are inadequately staffed for the subject and there is often indifference to what happens at Key Stage 3. It is to Ofsted’s credit that its inspectors do care about what goes on in classrooms as well as instrumental teaching and the development of ensembles. The report castigates schools for their superficial attitudes: Continue reading
I’m delighted to announce that our company, UCan Play, is working collaboratively with I Like Music, the providers of Desktop DJ, the only commercial music streaming service fully licensed for educational use in schools, colleges and universities.
The I Like Music collection is built on the original collection of music fanatic and BBC Radio Producer, Phil Swern (pictured here on the right with the collection that is housed in a secure location in London). It includes every UK Top 40 Hit single since the charts began in 1952, the majority of The US Hot 100 and a comprehensive collection of every conceivable genre including jazz, classical and world music – constantly updated with the latest releases (on average, around 8,000 each month).
UCan Play is looking for schools to work with to tailor the I Like Music archive for educational use. In return for a 50% reduction in your school’s subscription to I Like Music, we would ask you to complete a 5 playlists each with 10 tracks based around curriculum themes, topics or subjects. We would work collaboratively with you on this. You can download our introductory pack about this amazing offer here.
Please rest assured, that all this music is fully licensed for use in an educational context. Unlike other sources of music that are illegal for use in schools, such as You Tube, Spotify and iTunes, the I Like Music music has secured all the appropriate licenses for curricula and extra-curricula usage.
If your school is interested in working with us in this way, please contact us and we can send you some further information. In the meantime, why not explore the I Like Music collection by trying it for yourself?
I really enjoyed reading this post by Heather Mendick today. I would encourage you to read it and follow up on some of the references contained within. Heather argues that Teach First is a form of social class reproduction. This occurs through:
- the accumulation by participants of additional social and cultural capital;
- the reproduction of middle-class values and stereotypes of the working-class ‘other’;
- the obscuring of middle-class advantage through discourses of ‘natural ability’.
The broader politics around Teach First are also explored. In her research, Heather recounts ’TF participants referring to themselves as ‘fire fighters’ and ‘saviours’’ and she asks hows this influences the position and perception of all of the other teachers in our schools (as well as what it says about how Teach First and its teachers view the young people with whom they work?).
In terms of cost, I’m in agreement with Heather when she states that:
In an age of austerity, it is clearly an ideological choice that has led politicians of all stripes to robustly support Teach First, by far the most expensive form of training, while Gove destroys the best value and most effective form of initial teacher education, within universities. As the series has progressed, we’ve seen the ‘tough young teachers’ improve, and the inclusion of a second year teacher who is more self-assured, signals this developmental narrative thread that supports the effectiveness of on-the-job training and thus the move of teacher education into schools.
Thanks for such an informative insight into your research Heather.